| The same quality of life amenities that served
as attractions or “pulls” can suddenly diminish
as growth transforms the natural landscape
and brings with it the congestion of increased
road-building, housing developments, services,
light-industries and of course, more people
to a specific area that was at one time, “less
congested, safer and cleaner” (see Bennett,
1996).
This evolutionary transformation has
been described by Longino (1995) along
with discussions of how the changes affect
migration patterns:
“So long as there is a perceived
quality of life difference in the
environments at origin and
destination, the better quality of
life will attract new residents who
are retired. Retirees who moved
into and have lived in a Sun Belt
community for 10 or 15 years will
often complain that the quality of
life has declined since they arrived,
and they often blame the decline on
the retirees who followed them and
those who keep coming.
The reason
they keep coming is that even in its
decline, as viewed by migrant oldtimers,
there is still a quality of life
advantage as compared with where
the new migrants originated. When
the difference narrows, however,
it begins to choke off in-migration
and generate new pressure for
retirement out migration from
the destination. People who retire in
Sun Belt cities sometimes subsequently
move to less crowded places with greater
scenic beauty, too, and feel that they
have traded up on their quality of life.”
|